Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Final Exam


            Both The Lesson by Toni Cade Bambara and The Growing College Gap by Tamara Draut discuss our nations growing financial issues between social classes. The Lesson juxtaposes black life to white society while Draut’s compares college attendance and financial aid statistics with those from 40 years ago. Both the story and essay comment on lifestyle differences as it relates to wealth.
            The Lesson by Toni Cade Bambara is a story about social values and norms of black society compares with those to whites. The story follows a group of African-American children who live in the slums of New York. Another woman named Miss Moore, who is an upper class black woman, gives these kids five dollars and puts them in a cab to show them around New York City. She takes them to FAO Schwartz where the kids are shocked with the ridiculous prices for simple toys. The point of this was for Miss Moore to show the children how upper class white society lived in comparison with them. Most of the kids couldn’t even understand how some toy would cost a family $35 when “thirty-five dollars would pay for the rent and the piano bill too” (Bambara 5). Miss Moore’s goal was to educate these children about the divide between the two classes and to understand how the wealth in our country isn’t divided up properly. She explains to them that “poor people have to wake up and demand their share of the pie” (Bambara 5). Miss Moore’s intentions were to contrast their lifestyles with the lifestyles of wealthy whites in order for them to better understand the divide between social classes.
            Tamara Drauts’s essay entitled The Growing College Gap similarly discusses social class in America but how it relates to the college education system. Draut compares income differences and tuition costs from the seventies to now to better explain the gap between well-off education individuals and the undereducated minority population. Draut first discusses the baseline in the seventies when “a professional with a college degree and a blue collar worker with a high school degree could live in the same community” (Draut 379).  She then goes on to explain that skyrocketing tuition and a major decline in financial aid creates a huge divide between those who attended college and those who didn’t, as it relates to their enormous earning difference. African American’s are more likely to enroll in a two-year college whereas “wealthier students are battling it out for seats at a handful of elite private institutions” (Draut 380). She explains that even though graduate enrollment increased among students of color, they still do not continue on for advanced degrees because of high levels of undergraduate debt. She asserts that as this problem worsens, “we’ll have a well-educated minority that is mostly white, and a swelling, undereducated majority that is mostly African American and Latino” (Draut 390).
            Although leaps and bounds have been made against discrimination for African-American’s in our country, both Draut’s essay and Bambara’s story seem to suggest otherwise. Both the texts comment on the African-American struggle relative to financial and social class differences. They draw similar parallels between the social class struggle and the hardships minorities still face today. 

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Works Cited

1. Book:

-Sigmund, Freud. The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: The Modern Library, 1938.

-Arlow, Jacob A. The legacy of Sigmund Freud. International Universities Press, 1956.

Journal:

-Reppen, Joseph. "The Relevance of Sigmund Freid for the 21st century." Psychoanalytic Psychology Vol 23(2). 2006. Ebsco Host. Web. 9 November 2010.

-Freud, Sigmund. "The Psychopathology of Everday Life." Foundations of Psychological thought: A history of Psychology. pp 237-243. Ebsco Host. Web. 9 November 2010.

2. Book:

-Winter, Douglas E. Stephen King, the Art of Darkness. New York: New American Library, 1984.

-Iaccino, James F. Jungian reflections within the cinema : a psychological analysis of sci-fi and fantasy archetypes. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1998.

Journal:

-Oakes, David Ashby. "Twentieth-Century American Gothic Literature as Cultural Artifact: Science and Technology as Sources of Destabilization in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft, Richard Matheson, and Stephen King." Dissertation Abstracts International. Vol. 59 Issue 5, pp 1573-1573. 1998. Ebsco Host. Web. 9 November 2010.

-Hoppenstand, Gary. 'Series(ous) SF Concerns." Journal of Popular Culture. Vol. 38 Issue 4, pp 603-604. 2005. Ebsco Host. Web. 9 November 2010.

3. Book:

-Hopkins, Lisa. Screening the Gothic. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2005.

-Duggett, Tom. Gothic romanticism: architecture, politics, and literary form. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Journal:

-Riley, Michael. “Gothic Melodrama and Spiritual romance: visions and Fidelity

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Pick a Scene

A scene that stuckout for me in Shawshank Redemption is the final scene where Red goes in to ask for parol and finally gets approved. Throughout the entire movie, he goes before the council multiple times to ask to be let out from his life sentence early and be put on parol. They ask him a series of questions, one of which being "do you think you're rehabilitated." In previous sessions, he always answered the same way: yes. In this scene though, Red goes before them and when they ask him the same question, he gives a different response. He confronts the man by asking what that word even truly means. He says that he thinks its a made up word for people like him to have a job. He goes on to say that what he think the guy should be asking is if he is sorry for what he did. And Red obviously explains that "theres not a day that goes by that I don't feel sorry for what I did." Through his speech he expresses how hes changed and what he's learned from the situation and by simply not answered "yes" to his question, Red was approved for Parol. Theres nothing that I don't understand, but I do wonder what it was that changed Reds response. After every time him giving the same exact answer, what was it that made him say something different? I think it was Andy, and him escaping, and just in general the way that he influenced him throughout their stay in prison. The way that this contributes to my essay would be exactly what Red was saying. This man sits there and from one or two questions, hes suppose to be able to rightfully judge if prisoners are ready to reenter the world? From one answer their suppose to be able to see if they've learned their lesson. But thats not the way it should be. Prisons should have people watching behavior and seeing if these guys's actions show that they've learned their lesson. Obviously actions speak louder then words and asking one or two mundane questions isn't going to reveal anything about anyone. Red just happened to stand up for himself and speak out against the guy and somehow that got him parol? That just doesn't make sense. If he never had the courage to lash back against him he probably would have never been granted parol. This definetly contributes to the corruption as the state just pays some guy to sit there and ask them one question and base their freedom off of it, which is so wrong. Also it contribues to the message about feeling free even in a prison because he obviously came to realize what he did and came to terms with it. And he came to terms with the fact that theres nothing he can do about it and as much as he wishes he could go back and tell his teenage self what a stupid idea it is, he knows that its too late. He knows that the old man who he is now is all thats left.

gray area
who makes the rules
commenting on the institution
apathy-dont care about them
failure of the system to do its duty

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Paper 3 Outline


Introduction:
-Backround information about the movie
-Backround information on what prisons are/ what they are suppose to do (goals)
Thesis: The corruption within the American correctional institution is portrayed in the film Shawshank Redemption by revealing the true conditions of life in prison. Prisoners’ inability to adjust back to everyday life, illegal activites and wrongful incarceration are just some themes that expose this corruption while suggesting the possibility of finding freedom within confinement and captivity within freedom.
Body #1
Topic Sentence:  This corruption is clearly expressed through these criminals incapability in adjusting to life outside prison as instead of ‘correcting’ the criminals, they make it impossible for them carry out a normal life outside the bounds of confinement.
-talk about Bogs, the man who hung himself after he was released from Prison
-Red’s nervousness to leave prison
-the use of solitary confinement, furthering the bounds of which they have to move--when there always in such a small space how could they ever adjust back to the world?
àthey felt free within prison because they taught them to feel this way and when they left they felt like they were in prison because they didn’t teach them how to reenter society

Body #2
Topic Sentence: The illegal activities exposed of prison life from not only the prisoners but of officers in power clearly suggest an element of corruption.
-Wardon Norton using prisoners as laborers so he doesn’t have to spend more
-Wardon using Andy to launder money all under a fake person
            -talk about the end and what happens to him
-Red somehow getting anything anybody wanted and sneaking it in

Body #2
Topic Sentence:
In this film, personal gain becomes more important than the truth about freeing an innocent man and suggests that false imprisonment within institutions is a common and normal scenario.
-define false imprisonment
-Andy was innocent but the Wardon killed the only person who could prove it so that he would continue helping him with laundering money
-Wardon only cared about what was best for him and not for others, selfish


Paper 3 Thesis Statement

The corruption within the American correctional institution is portrayed in the film Shawshank Redemption by revealing the true conditions of life in prison. Prisoners’ inability to adjust back to everyday life, illegal activites and wrongful incarceration are just some themes that expose this corruption while suggesting the possibility of finding freedom within confinement and captivity within freedom.

Paper 3 Prewrite

For my third paper I want to write about the movie Shawshank Redemption. I love this movie. I think it may be one of the greatest movies every made and there is so much that I could write about. What i really want to focus on is the corruption within the system. I really want to research information about prisons and correctional institutions and learn more about what there like, what they aim to do/their goals and the statistics for people who come out of them. In shawshank, the prison institution is portrayed in such a negative light. They call these places "correctional" institutions but they don't correct like they should. When these prisoners get let out of jail and kill themselves because they can't adjust to normal life-it didn't correct them at all. So I want to look at the corruption within prisons using this movie as evidence. What I just explained about prisoners killing themselves happened to one of the characters in the movie. He was let out after like 50 years in jail and he had his own apartment and got a job working at the grocery store but after a while he was so scared and didn't understand what life was like outside of prison. They kept him so sheltered for so long that he couldn't readjust back to reality and hung himself in his apartment. Then the other example in the movie would be about the Wardon. The wardon uses prisoners as laborers to do work around the jail so that he doesn't have to pay workers. Then he uses Andys accounting skills to his advantage and makes him launder money under a fake person. I also want to look at wrongful incarceration and how insane it is that some people spend their whole lives in jail for a crime they didn't commit. In the movie, Andy is seemingly innocent and when they find the guy who actually did commit the crime, the wardon has the man who was relaying the information killed so that andy would have to stay in jail and continue with scheming money. Theres so much within the movie that can provide evidence towards how these institutions are corrupt and the system needs to be reevaluated so that these prisoners can go to jail and recover from their crimes and not come out worse then they went in.


Discussion: My friend told me that I might need to broaden the topics a little bit so that I would have enough to talk about in 6 pages. She suggested that I go more into research about prisons and jails so that I can compare and contrast what prison is really like with the way that its portrayed in the movie and see if its accurate. She also suggested I re-watch the movie which I definitely want to do so that I can find more concrete examples to back up my thesis.

Legalize?

On the CNN website there is a video clip from the news today about election day and California's vote for Prop 19. Yes on Prop 19 would legalize the use of marijuana in the state of California. Prop 19 aims to "control and tax cannabis." The video clip is from a pep rally held today on the state vote of wether or not marijuana should be legalized. The woman's argument for why Californians should vote yes on 19 is because of the obvious boost our economy would get from this. She talks about the amount of that is going to criminal drug cartels and how all that money should be going to the state. They talk about drug and gang-related murders that have happened because of the drug cartel and how the legalization of cannabis would make our streets safer. We would stop arresting people for possession of marijuana and let the police focus on more violent crimes and criminals. As a Californian myself, I'm not sure where I stand on this topic. I think that many of the points that they made are quite valid, but the actual legalization of something that has been illegal for so long would just be weird. I couldn't imagine being on the streets of LA and smelling someone smoke weed as casually as they would a cigarette.